Skip to main content
Stop manually translating architecture diagrams into attack scenarios — Snapsec generates a complete threat map instantly.

​
Why Automated Threat Mapping Matters

Traditional threat modeling takes days or weeks because teams must manually:
  • Interpret architecture diagrams
  • Review API collections
  • Identify trust boundaries
  • Map attack vectors
  • Document threats
This slows down engineering cycles and makes threat modeling a bottleneck. Snapsec solves this by automatically converting system architecture or API definitions into a full threat map — in seconds.
Auto-detects components, data flows, trust boundaries, and interaction surfaces
Generates relevant threats for each component or endpoint
Provides a visual threat topology to improve developer understanding
Ensures consistency across all threat modeling projects

​
How Snapsec Generates a Threat Map

1

Upload a Diagram or API Collection

Start by adding a system diagram, sequence diagram, OpenAPI/Swagger spec, or Postman collection.
2

Parse Components & Data Flows

Snapsec analyzes services, endpoints, trust boundaries, data stores, roles, and connections.
3

Generate Threat Candidates

Using AI-powered models, Snapsec identifies threats aligned with STRIDE, OWASP API Top 10, and CWE.
4

Render the Visual Threat Map

A complete threat graph is produced showing nodes (assets) and edges (attack paths), linked to real threats.

​
What Problems This Solves

Missing Threat Coverage

Eliminates human oversight by ensuring every component and data flow is analyzed.

Slow Threat Modeling

Reduce modeling time from days to minutes with automated mapping.

Inconsistent Analysis

Standardize threat generation across teams and applications.

​
Key Benefits for Your Security Team

Consistent Threat Models

Every project follows the same structured, automated threat generation logic.

Developer-Friendly Visuals

Visual threat paths make it easier for engineers to understand risk.

Immediate Threat Coverage

Snapsec produces threats instantly after parsing architecture and API definitions.

Deep Integration

Works with diagrams, Swagger files, Postman collections, and service metadata.

​
Example Outputs

Threat paths showing how a compromised microservice can escalate into sensitive data access.
Threats mapped to endpoints lacking authentication or input validation.
Identified weak trust boundaries between public and internal components.

​
What Happens After Mapping

1

Review Threats

All generated threats appear in the Threat Review Console with severity, references, and mitigation steps.
2

Assign Owners

Each threat is assigned to relevant engineering or security teams for triage.
3

Integrate With Projects

Threats are synced automatically to the associated threat modeling project.
4

Track Lifecycles

Threats move through Pending → Acknowledged → In Progress → Fixed → Fix Verified.

​
Next Steps

Explore Full Threat Modeling Capabilities

Learn how Snapsec accelerates, scales, and automates modern threat modeling workflows.